Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/epih/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2023-03.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 44; 2022 > Article
Methods The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers
Stefano Parodi1orcid , Damiano Verda2orcid , Francesca Bagnasco1orcid , Marco Muselli2,3orcid
Epidemiol Health 2022;44e2022088-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022088
Published online: October 17, 2022
  • 963 Views
  • 60 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
1Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
2Rulex Innovation Labs, Genoa, Italy
3Institute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering, National Research Council of Italy, Genoa, Italy
Corresponding author:  Stefano Parodi,
Email: parodistefano@icloud.com
Received: 22 June 2022   • Accepted: 17 October 2022

OBJECTIVES
The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) is a popular measure of pure diagnostic accuracy that is independent from the proportion of diseased subjects in the analysed sample. However, its actual usefulness in the clinical context has been questioned, because it does not seem to be directly related to the actual performance of a diagnostic marker in identifying diseased and non-diseased subjects in real clinical settings. This study evaluates the relationship between the AUC and the proportion of correct classifications (global diagnostic accuracy, GDA) in relation to the shape of the corresponding ROC curves.
METHODS
We demonstrate that AUC represents an upward-biased measure of GDA at an optimal accuracy cut-off for balanced groups. The magnitude of bias depends on the shape of the ROC plot and on the proportion of diseased and non-diseased subjects. In proper curves, the bias is independent from the diseased/non-diseased ratio and can be easily estimated and removed. Moreover, a comparison between 2 partial AUCs can be replaced by a more powerful test for the corresponding whole AUCs.
RESULTS
Applications to 3 real datasets are provided: a marker for a hormone deficit in children, 2 tumour markers for malignant mesothelioma, and 2 gene expression profiles in ovarian cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The AUC is a measure of accuracy with potential clinical relevance for the evaluation of disease markers. The clinical meaning of ROC parameters should always be evaluated with an analysis of the shape of the corresponding ROC curve.


Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health